The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict

War in the Gaza Strip has continued now over week, diplomats and demonstrations are demanding  ceasefire immediately – war news and high-flown statements are following each other like they have done last decades.   In this never ending story it was very refreshing to read an article of John R. Bolton published in Washington post 5th Jan. 2009. This former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations 2005-2006  has quite unusual idea to solve the Gaza conflict. Instead of empty statements and dead road maps he is proposing “The Three-State Option”.  Again his thoughts are not pleasant or polite to highly idealistic diplomatic elite but maybe therefore his idea could work on the ground.

The original article can be found from here but I quote some highlights:

We should ask why we still advocate the “two-state solution,” with Israel and “Palestine” living side by side in peace, as the mantra goes. We are obviously not progressing, and are probably going backward. We continue poring over the Middle East “road map” because that is all we have, faute de mieux, as they say in Foggy Bottom. The logic to this position is long past its expiration date. Unfortunately, it is hard to imagine a new approach that the key players would receive enthusiastically. If the way out were obvious, after all, it would already have been suggested.

Mr Bolton asks us to consider the following, unpopular and difficult to implement though it may be:

  • we should look to a “three-state” approach, where Gaza is returned to Egyptian control and the West Bank in some configuration reverts to Jordanian sovereignty.
  • Having the two Arab states re-extend their prior political authority is an authentic way to extend the zone of peace and, more important, build on governments that are providing peace and stability in their own countries. “International observers” or the like cannot come close to what is necessary; we need real states with real security forces.
  • Without a larger Egyptian role, Gaza will not, and perhaps cannot, achieve the minimal stability necessary for economic development. Moreover, connecting Gaza to a real economy, rather than a fictional “Palestinian economy,” is the quickest concrete way to improve the lives of Gaza’s ordinary citizens.
  • For Palestinians, admitting the obvious failure of the PA (Palestinian Authority), and the consequences of their selection of Hamas, means accepting reality, however unpleasant. But it is precisely Palestinians who would most benefit from stability. The PA — weakened, corrupt and discredited — is not a state by any realistic assessment, nor will it become one accepted by Israel as long as Hamas or terrorism generally remains a major political force among Palestinians.
  • Objections to this idea will be manifold, and implementation difficult. One place to avoid problems is dispensing with intricate discussions over the exact legal status of Gaza and the West Bank. These territories contain more legal theories than land.

I agree with Mr. Bolton about three-state solution. However it could be a bit further developed by making a buffer zone between Israel and hardliners in Gaza. From my point of view the best way to do this is to relocate population from Gaza some 50-100 km SW to Sinai. There is possible to build new infrastructure instead again repairing existing one. With good planning and implementing econo-social programmes backed with sufficient international Aid money  it is possible also to create more sustainable economy than today’s Gaza.


Few days ago I wrote an articleGaza War – Could Balkan history show way out? which highlights population movements as pragmatic solution in cases when ethnic tensions are too deep to cure without generations long “brainwashing”.  Combined to Mr. Bolton’s proposal I think that a sustainable solution could be found.

About these ads

22 Responses to The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict

  1. [...] Boltonin artikkeli Washingtonpostista (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic… ja http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2009/01/06/the-thre… ). Osuvan tilannekuvauksen ohella hän esittää ratkaisuksi kolmen valtion vaihtoehtoa jossa Gaza [...]

  2. [...] Hi all! Nice to see that things has calmed down in here…. But to the topic I found this The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict AriRusilas BalkanBlog and found some new ideas in there how to solve this thing… Have a look and let me know what you [...]

  3. [...] I wonder why there is not more discussion about a “three-state” approach, where Gaza is returned to Egyptian control and the West Bank in some configuration reverts to Jordanian sovereignty. From my point of view this solution could also be more economically sustainable than other options. It could be a bit further developed by making a buffer zone between Israel and hard-liners in Gaza. From my point of view the best way to do this is to relocate population from Gaza some 50-100 km SW to Sinai. There is possible to build new infrastructure instead again repairing existing one. With good planning and implementing economic-social programmes backed with sufficient international Aid money it is possible also to create more sustainable economy than today’s Gaza. More in “The Three-State Option could solve Gaza Conflict”. [...]

  4. [...] Balkan history show way out?” ) or changing two-state solution to three-state option (more in “The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict” ). Putting other options on the table could give totally different vision to international Aid [...]

  5. [...] Balkan history show way out?” ) ja kahden valtion mallin korvaaminen kolmen valtion mallilla (“The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict” ). Moraalittomia, juhlapuheiden vastaisia jne myönnän mutta ehkä kuitenkin pragmaattisia. Miksei [...]

  6. [...] be from administrative point of view stronger as well economically more sustainable. (More e.g. in “The Three-State Option could solve Gaza Conflict” [...]

  7. [...] and now I still consider sc Three State-Option the most pragmatic solution. As Egypt now is opening Rafah border crossing and when its current [...]

  8. [...] proposals in PaliLeaks, land swaps and desperate search of peace ). Saying this I still consider sc Three State-Option the most pragmatic solution for israeli-Palestinian [...]

  9. [...] with help of economic-social programmes backed with sufficient international Aid money. (More in “The Three-State Option could solve Gaza Conflict” [...]

  10. [...] kahden valtion mallin korvaaminen kolmen valtion mallilla “The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict” / [...]

  11. [...] the Three-State-Option “The Three-State Option could solve Gaza conflict” [...]

  12. [...] Terror? Saudi-Israeli cooperation for attacking Iran Fragments of the Middle East peace efforts The Three-State Option could solve Gaza Conflict Share this:Like this:LikeBe the first to like [...]

  13. [...] Israeli Vs Palestine Refugees – In, Out and No Return , US Giving a “Yellow Light” to an Israeli Strike Days of Rage on the Arab street Support for Iranian Opposition Egypt at crossroads – theocrazy, democracy or something between PaliLeaks, land swaps and desperate search of peace Cyber war has became a tool between political and military options Is Yemen the next target for the War on Terror? Saudi-Israeli cooperation for attacking Iran Fragments of the Middle East peace efforts The Three-State Option could solve Gaza Conflict [...]

  14. [...] have been advocating long Three State Option as the most pragmatic solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For 19 years, Judea and Samaria [...]

  15. [...] have been advocating long Three State Option as the most pragmatic solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For 19 years, Judea and Samaria [...]

  16. [...] ja jaettu Jordanialais-Egyptiläinen hallinto, on hyvin lähellä itse jo vuosia propagoimaani kolmen valtion palautusmallia, jossa länsirannasta Israelin kanssa sovittavat osat palautetaan Jordanian [...]

  17. [...] have been advocating long Three State Option as the most pragmatic solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For 19 years, Judea and Samaria [...]

  18. [...] have been advocating long Three State Option as the most pragmatic solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The geographic juxtaposition [...]

  19. [...] have been advocating long Three State Option as the most pragmatic solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The geographic juxtaposition [...]

  20. [...] ja jaettu Jordanialais-Egyptiläinen hallinto, on hyvin lähellä itse jo vuosia propagoimaani kolmen valtion palautusmallia (kutsuttu myös nimellä “no-state option”), jossa länsirannasta Israelin [...]

  21. [...] A Jordanian-Palestinian Confederation Is On The Move ) Indeed this kind of approach is quite near Three State (return) Option which I have been advocating long as the most pragmatic solution to Israeli-Palestinian [...]

  22. [...] mahdollistuvat esimerkiksi Jordania-Palestiina (kon)federaatio tai jopa itse parhaana pitämäni kolmen valtion (palautus) ratkaisu . Joka tapauksessa Obaman vierailu mahdollistaa neuvotteluikkunan avaamisen, se käyttävätkö [...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 135 other followers

%d bloggers like this: